this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
59 points (84.7% liked)
Electric Vehicles
3217 readers
205 users here now
A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No self-promotion
- No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
- No trolling
- Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're just intentionally ignoring the first half of that sentence where I said their numbers were verified in real-world use by third parties.
I found a "Run on Less" page. Nothing about any testing. Perhaps you have a link?
LOL what? 500 mile range is a 500 mile range. There is no "how". There's only one way that works.
Sauce?
I mean you made it pretty clear that I did.
How convenient. If they're such shitboxes, why would they care?
There are zero links in your comment. I don't believe you.
When you look at the Drive on Less data, it isn't.
Um, what are you talking about? Literally the entire campaign is about collecting fleet data over an 18 day period.
Ok, so then if I can find a 500 mile down hill stretch and I take the battery out completely, I have a 500 mile range. That's what you just said, and I think you know that's nonsense.
See the links I already posted.
Ok. That doesn't really impact me. You can believe the company that his lied constantly about capabilities if you want, that's fine. Not being skeptical at all of their claims makes complete sense given their track record at this point.
Whenever you're ready to back any of this up, I'm ready to take a look at it.
Like I said, it doesn't really impact me. So, you can feel how you want to feel. I don't believe anything Tesla says because I've owned one, and I know how they attempt to manipulate their news cycle. I also downloaded the raw data and ran the numbers myself. The Semi does not achieve 500 mile range with a full gross weight traveling at normal highway speeds. You can calculate the rate of SOC decline between data points where the average speed was > 50 MPH and it comes nowhere close.
Now, if on the other hand the title said DHL was happy with their Semi test bed then that wouldn't really be up for dispute. But the instant the title said it achieves 500 miles then I'm sorry but there's no data to support that claim that has ever been published. And I promise you, if such data did exist Tesla would be the first to brag about it incessantly.
Then why do you keep coming back here and replying to me? Post sources or don't spread disinformation. We're not interested in your anecdotes.
I figured we were having a discussion. Calling it disinformation is hilarious though.
We're not having a discussion. You're just injecting your opinions into a conversation and then refusing to provide any evidence.
The dude's obviously a troll or a frustration vampire. Just block him.
Cool. Yeah, that's how people behave. You should meet more of them, I think. Also, quite a bit of that piece is Fred's opinion, so maybe consider that.