this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
61 points (98.4% liked)

Games

16679 readers
1139 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Banning scams is absolutely the government's job.

This business model is a scam.

Buying and selling is what I want, but it's not what these assholes offer - they are taking money in exchange for fuck-all. For "gems." For time on a clock they made up. For a chance to get a ticket to run a dungeon to roll drops that might give you a thing that's already in the game you're playing.

Horse armor was perfectly ethical, relative to this abuse. That's how bad this is. It is neither a good nor a service. It is fundamentally not an acceptable thing to charge any amount of money for.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Just yelling scam as loud as you can doesn't actually make something a scam pal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Ignoring the argument doesn't mean there was no argument.

Troll harder.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)