[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6601 readers

1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Thoughts about sublinks ? (lemmy.today)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is it gonna reach anywhere or die out like kbin and the way it is going i would say mbin ? They are also trying to dip toe in the microblogging platform as well and trying to use lemmy clients and that confuses me as they are promising some features lemmy doesn't have so how would that and the microblogging part work out on lemmy clients . Also srry if i am at the wrong /c/ and just point me in the right way .

EDIT: After some researches i don't think i wanna support sublink as the devs didn't open any issues or propose any contributions to lemmy which could've solved the whole mod tools issue for everyone but they straight up went to forking for who knows why and that is not a good look.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

The killer feature of sublinks is going to the ability to move an existing lemmy instance to it. That is its strength because it means that it's not only start up instances that can use it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That's awesome, I didn't know about that.

load more comments (4 replies)