this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
292 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59186 readers
4414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“I have seen these addictive algorithms pull in young people, literally capture them and make them prisoners in a space where they are cut off from human connection, social interaction and normal classroom activity,” she said.

The smartphone-ban bill will follow two others Hochul is pushing that outline measures to safeguard children’s privacy online and limit their access to certain features of social networks.

In New York, the bills have faced pushback from big tech, trade groups and other companies, which collectively spent more than $800,000 between October and March lobbying against one or both of them, according to public disclosure records.

This differs from other state-level bills across the country, which place some reliance on self-policing by tech companies to decide which features could be harmful by completing assessments of whether products are “reasonably likely” to be accessed by children.

“Meta itself admits its own parental controls aren’t widely used – they’re often confusing and frequently fail to work as intended,” said Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, a policy advocacy organization.

The major social media firms have faced increasing scrutiny over harms against children, including sextortion scams, grooming by predators and worsening mental health.


The original article contains 922 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

This is a bad move

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

She is a horrible person but for this one thing I agree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I wonder how many comments on Lemmy were written out under a desk in class.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Take away kids ability to communicate with family and law enforcement when they get shot up.

Genius idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The article covers that, simple devices that don't have Internet are allowed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

No internet? That animal is long extinct

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

What phone doesn't have internet anymore?

Edit: Wait, I get it. So now kids have their at home phone AND their parents also pay for their "you're at school so this is how you get us your last words in the event of a shooting" phone.

Again, genius.

Parents needing to pay MORE money they don't have and kids have ANOTHER reminder of how their job is basically to obey AND very possibly be killed while obeying.

So much better of a solution instead of MOTHER FUCKING GUN CONTROL.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago

I think I actually agree with this. I'm libertarian and generally believe fewer restrictions are better, but schools should be able to restrict what kids have available to them during class. Kids should be able to bring them to school, but they should be put away while class is in session.

If parents disagree with that policy, they can enroll their kids somewhere else. But schools should absolutely have authority over what's allowed on school property.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Can we just ban smartphones in general? Please?

Go back to payphones and pagers and if you need to carry information in your pocket, PDAs where you have useful non-connected apps and download information ahead of time at home and store on the device instead of using a slow, unreliable, garbage tracking device to find what you need.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I'm with you. I have similar relationship with connected devices as I do with cigarettes.

I don't like being threatened by the state but banning something has a bonus effect of making it look dirty.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Good. Go even further and bad kids from mobile phones until they're at least 15, and teach them how to responsibly use them

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›