14,000 one pound bombs?
Interesting Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
- [email protected] - News and information from Europe.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
14,000 bombs with a 2,000lb payload. Bit of a confusing headline (and article, considering there's no contradiction between him saying he will not do it anymore in the future and him already having done it in the past (the 14k bombs are from past shipments).
Of course there should be no shipments at all, but I don't get the point of the article.
the point of the article
"Biden is doing bad thing, don't vote for him!" - news outlets that have reasons for wanting Republicans to win, or care more about clickbait than news
"Don't elect this person who bombs Palestine (so this other person who will bomb Palestine more will win)!"
(and also who will ensure other brown people get bombed with extreme prejudice)
Nobody likes a shit sandwich, but since there aren't nearly enough people willing to smash the plate into someone's face, we have to choose one scoop of shit or twelve.
At least with the single scoop there's at least the possibility of changing the menu.
They are so pro-republican that they have a header at the top of the page about Project 2025...
The difference between corporate media and independent non-profit media (for the most part) is that they don't take sides, and call out everyone.
So he has stopped shipments, but the article writer is mad that he hasn't gone back in time and stopped shipments that happened in the past?