this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
377 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45550 readers
2175 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Im rooting for everyone to stop paying attention to bullshit billionaires say, and start paying attention to the bullshit billionaires actually do

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, we were all sold on the illusion that these fucks are smarter or work harder than everyone else.

Ive met some of these fucks - inbred old money peices of shit all of them.

Wouldnt piss on a person to put out a fire, zero compassion psychopaths.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One of them literally just had his submersible implode because he was smarter than safety regulators.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is it a bit too soon to say "good riddance"

Like it's awful, people died, that does suck and it is a tragedy... but at the same token, consequences of your actions. If you're dumb enough to get on an unregulated submersible controlled by an old, off brand Xbox controller and dive to more than double it's rated depth.... don't be surprised when things go wrong and you die.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, everybody is talking and forming opinions on the topic, while it’s just really just a “why would I care” type of news? When hundreds of refugees drown on a sinking ship, it’s a sidenote in a daily news feed, so it’s annoying when the media then blows up this “news” about rich people nobody heard of before.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think part of it is the location. Off the coast of Greece? Ships pass through all the time, one's bound to sink. Law of really large numbers.

But the Titanic? It's both inaccessible and highly mythologised.

Sure wealth is a factor but it's only one of many.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's not impugn the good name of the Logitech F710. It's a perfectly fine controller.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I love that the internet's take on the sub thing seems to have arrived at 'jokes are fine but leave the controller out of it'. Very on brand, I must respect it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

whoa whoa whoa... I'mma let you finish, but the controller is a fine device, and logitech has some pretty good stuff. The mindboggling thing is that they used it for A SUB.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I don't think good riddance needs to be said anyway, all that needs to be said is dude was an idiot and got himself and others killed because of it. Being rich doesn't innoculate you from being stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think good riddance needs to be said

I mean that is it too early to say that the world is a better place without these rich fucks wasting resources?

[–] sobriquet 2 points 1 year ago

A bunch of rich people sank to the bottom of the ocean because of arrogance and ignored safety concerns, while trying to see a ship that was full of rich people that sank to the bottom of the ocean because of arrogance and ignored safety concerns.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

paraphrasing Linus Torvalds: "talk is cheap, show your actions" (original: "talk is cheap, show me the code")

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I just read a good article about big tech is never a friend to decentralized stuff. You can find it here.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Interesting read lets hope we can keep Meta and Zuck out.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That article needs more eyeballs on it. Maybe some funny memes to get that message out quickly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Good thinking 👍.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Someone needs to at least create a let me in meme with Meta and Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This very much parallels the Embrace, Extend, Extingush philosophy pioneered by Microsoft in relation to open source software.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a great read for getting some historical context.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not only for historical context but to prevent that history from repeating itself.

Facebook joining the fediverse will be for one reason only and that will be to find a way to crush it and/or monetize.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Good read 👍.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Big tech has no problem with decentra, the one doing client monetization are on that fight. Some of them are big tech but that does not make the whole of bt accomplice of the fight.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I wish Zuckerberg developed an interest in the titanic. He keeps ruining my hobbies!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm receptive to the arguments that the Fediverse should be open even to Meta, but we've seen this play out too many times before - you simply can't trust a big company like Meta not to try to take over + destroy the Fediverse, when there are tremendous financial incentives to their doing so and no meaningful negative consequences if they do.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, you know they'll use the good ole MS triple-E tactic: embrace, extend, and extinguish.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The fediverse is open to Meta. They're welcome to do what they want. I will simply choose to not federate with and actively block every iota of content or instances they create or touch. Zuck is an ugly cancer on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meta the company started saying they were going to build a twitter replacement on the fediverse and some instances made a pact to block them to protect their users from Metas invasive privacy violations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is ironic given that the Fediverse's structure is pretty much wide open.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I see it as the Paradox of Tolerance (with proprietary walled-garden makers standing in for the nazis): in order to have a free and open Fediverse, we must not tolerate those who would close it up.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Meta (parent of Facebook, instagram…etc) want to have their content to become federated and part of Lemmy and Mastodon.

Meta has been asking Mastodon and Lemmy server admins to have a “off the record” discussion panel. They told meta to fuck off.

Here’s a post about the email meta has been sending to admins and his response.

https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/82022/Kev-Quirk-one-of-the-admins-of-Fosstodon-a-Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

one admin told them that. some of them have actually met with Meta after signing an NDA earlier this week.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That is true. Albeit attending a meeting doesn't necessarily mean you're gonna be selling your soul to Meta. Hopefully, those that do decide to attend stand up for the communities that are being built in the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I would personally be inclined to take the meeting to better know how to counter their efforts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh, I'd really be interested into hearing what is said in that meeting...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They made the admins sign nda's so its unlikely we will hear anything about it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

unfortunate... something ought to be leaked sometime... I mean their messing with internet culture. I hope something slips through

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Fuck that NDA leak the meeting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, if i was an admin i would rationalize that its in your interest to listen to the enemy if they might reveal their evil plan. Even if you have to sign a contract that you can publicly talk about it. (Can always confine to a distant acquittance that is prone to start rumours)

load more comments
view more: next ›