Once you try Vim you will never use another text editor. Or any other program for that matter because you won't be able to exit.
linuxmemes
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudo
in Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
I also had that experience with emacs, which has a built in help system. I couldn't find a topic on 'exit' or 'quit' and refused to just search online.
Took me half an hour.
and refused to just search online
Unless you were f*cked by your ISP as I am right now, that's having some balls. Or being masochist. But nothing in between
If I wanted to hear about what's good about Vim, should I:
a) ask what's good about vim
-OR-
b) assert blindly that there is nothing good about vim so fanboys will come crawling out of the walls tripping over each other to tell me how I'm wrong?
Doesn't matter we will tell you either way.
- Instead of simply shortcuts, vim uses "chords". Every new shortcut I learn can be combined intuitively* with all the other shortcuts I know.
- Because of this there's no faster way to edit files than Vim in the hands of an experienced user.
- this let's me spend almost no time editing code, freeing up the rest of my time for swearing at piss poor documentation.
* I use "intuitively" here in a way that not merely stretches, but outright abuses the definition of the word.
Thank you for telling me all this neat stuff! :D
I think I get what you are intending to imply by the word "intuitively"; it's that it eventually becomes as reflexive and fluid as touch-typing itself.
Gosh you make it sound almost like you play Vim like an instrument more than use it...!
Honestly that sounds cool ^_^
tl;dr: Run vimtutor
, learn vim, enjoy life
It's extremely powerful, for mostly the same reason that it's incomprehensible to newbies. It's focused not on directly inputting characters from your keyboard, but on issuing commands to the editor on how to modify the text.
These commands are simple but combine to let you do exactly what you want with just a few keypresses.
For example:
w is a movement command that moves one word forward.
You can put a number in front of any command to repeat it that many times, so 3w
moves three words forward.
d is the delete command. You combine it with a movement command that tells it what to delete. So dw
deletes one word and d3w
deletes the next three words.
f is the find movement command. You press it and then a character to move to the first instance of that character. So f.
will move to the end of the current sentence, where the period is.
Now, knowing only this, if you wanted to delete the next two sentences, you could do that by pressing d2f.
Hopefully I gave a taste of how incredibly powerful, flexible, yet simple this system is. You only need to know a handful of commands to use vim more effectively than you ever could most other editors. And there are enough clever features that any time you think "I wish there was a better way to do this" there most certainly is (as well as a nice description of how).
It also comes with a guide to help you get over the initial learning curve, run vimtutor
in a console near you to get started on the path to ~~salvation~~ efficient editing.
You shouldn't talk about vim at all! Just write that vscode is the most flexible code editor.
nano just works for me man
Getting used to vim has made nano unusable for me. The muscle memory is too strong. That and all of the regex and plugin features (ex. LSP) are just too useful.
alias vim="nano"
alias vim=nvim
alias vi=nvim
alias nano=nvim
alias emacs=nvim
alias code=nvim
export EDITOR=nvim
export VISUAL=nvim
export PAGER=nvim
Helix <3
vanilla helix is so nice, the keybindings make so much more sense and it feels really comfortable
This, but Emacs
Anytime I open Vim I ask the same question.
"how the fuck do I use you?"
then go back to nano
repeat.
NANO GANG RISE
for everything else, there's sublime.
I tend to work on customer systems where I'm not allowed to install anything. I've yet to encounter one that doesn't have vi
installed, but I've seen a few without nano
.
vi is part of the POSIX standard, so it'll be available in some form on almost anything UNIX-flavoured
I've no choice coz I haven't been able to quit for last 7 years.
The only Dad advice you nerds need:
mcedit from the Midnight Commander (mc) tool is the superior text editor.
I don't even run arch, btw.
Genuinely took most of my notes in college on vim, when you get good it’s just faster.
I'm sure someone already made a graph plotting the hours wasted learning vs the seconds gained not moving your mouse.
How did these people have "text editor wars" and yet failed to deliver a text editor half as good as microsoft's edit.com ?
I'm sorry nano, you're think you're hot ?
But you put search on CTRL+W !!!
Do you know how stupid that is ?
Just go and try that in your browser ...
In the meantime I'm happy with Kate.
Aw, I'm sure she's happy with you too . ❤️
May I introduce you to our Savior Helix?
I'm gonna laugh my ass off if someone finds out there was some obscure Emacs fork or clone designed to run Clojure or something, and it's named Again
there is no text editor there is only nano