unfortunate
Profit is theft not property smh
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13505 readers
29 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Private property/capital can be understood as theft because it requires an enclosure of the commons at its root, which is done by force more often than not.
That's critique is more appropriate for something like land, but owning cnc machine and a patent doesn't translate to theft. the fact that workers who do stuff on these machines can't afford what they make does
Okay Rousseau, but Marx' s argument is not that property isn't theft, but that that the existence of the term "Theft" requires accepting that property is valid
Profit is not theft either. The point of capital vol 1 is that exploitation happens without any theft. Even an ideal, "fair" capitalism is still based on exploitation.
Well, yes, but better fit than property.
Plus at some point on the sliding scale of worker not getting full compensation -> peasant paying 60 % to the lord -> slave paying everything and receiving food as recompense for their labor, you can feasibly argue about theft somewhere round peasant mark.
Of course its not legally defined theft, cause tools of the master and law in its majestic equality blah blah