It's an interesting read to see what they think people thought of the sets, and it's good to see that some of the issues I had with sets and opinions I shared are getting to them. But there's not a ton here that we don't already know, especially if you're active in MTG communities already. Like when he says
The game has plenty of legendary creatures, so why did we turn what was the most unique group of characters into something more mundane?
I dunno, why did you? Seems like that's a question that could have been discussed, but it wasn't really.