this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
946 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59132 readers
5184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Just for now, soon this practice will be normalized and widely used, after all we are in the late capitalism stage and all violations are relativized

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

“Just so we’re clear guys, fake evidence is not allowed”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We do not need AI pulling a George Lucas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Used to be that people called it the "CSI Effect" and blamed it on television.

Funny thing. While people worry about unjust convictions, the "AI-enhanced" video was actually offered as evidence by the defense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

"When we enhance the image and place a knife in the defendant's hand..."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

During Kyle Rittenhouse's trial the defense attorney objected to using the pinch to zoom feature of an iPad because it (supposedly) used AI. This was upheld by the judge so the prosecution couldn't zoom in on the video.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

How does this work when you have a shitty Samsung that turns a pic of a pic of the moon into the Moon by adding details that weren't there?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial.

And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

Lawyers for Puloka wanted to introduce cellphone video captured by a bystander that’s been AI-enhanced, though it’s not clear what they believe could be gleaned from the altered footage.

For example, there was a widespread conspiracy theory that Chris Rock was wearing some kind of face pad when he was slapped by Will Smith at the Academy Awards in 2022.

Using the slider below, you can see the pixelated image that went viral before people started feeding it through AI programs and “discovered” things that simply weren’t there in the original broadcast.

Large language models like ChatGPT have convinced otherwise intelligent people that these chatbots are capable of complex reasoning when that’s simply not what’s happening under the hood.


The original article contains 730 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›