this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
11 points (92.3% liked)

Motorcycles

2456 readers
13 users here now

Here we discuss everything related to riding, maintenance and gear.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is being cross-posted for as much feedback as I can get.

My '12 Honda CBR600RR is nearing the end of it's life at 82,000 miles; there's minor visible scoring in the nikasil plating in the cylinders, and that's only going to get worse.

I can get the cylinders replated--assuming that the scoring is no worse than I think it is--for about $800 + the cost of shipping the block, but that would require being able to entirely rebuild the engine on my own. I'd probably want to also regrind the valve seats, replace the valves, piston heads, and def. piston rings if I did that. I've already got the cylinder head off because the valves weren't holding pressure.

I can get a replacement engine for around $1500-2500. I can replace an engine on my own, although it's a pain in the ass.

Or, I can get a new bike. But I'm not sure what makes and models for my riding style will have any better longevity than my CBR600RR has had.

My current short-list is a crashed '07- '12 CBR600RR (because I can easily swap necessary parts/bodywork, etc.), or a Yamaha YZF R6, Suzuki GSX R750, or Triumph Speed Triple 1050 (which is prone to electrical issues, and also needs some creative headlight adjustment to work with clip-on bars). Does anyone have experience with the YZF R6, GSX R750, or Speed Triple? Any issues to watch out for that might prevent any of them from making it to 100k miles without major mechanical work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Very nice, and my favorite bit is that the principles you learn on a simple moto engine easily scale to a full-size car or even truck engine. Spark, fuel, air, all at the right times and ratios. Everything else follows.

Still, considering a switch to electric, just because I mostly commute and don't want to contribute to environmental destruction. Just wish batteries had a bit more range ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You make good points. I've worked on a couple cars before but bikes require much less space, time and money.

Also, just keep in mind the process of making batteries for electric cars. Lithium mines are by no means clean and cause lots of deforestation.

Personally I'm really hoping we see a bigger uptick in Hydrogen powered vehicles, seeing as in theory, any gasoline car can be converted, plus our current repair facilities and methods will mostly carry over. It makes a lot more sense to me to adapt what we have than to uproot and start over from scratch.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Nah there's a lot going for EVs in the material recycling realm, see redwood materials inc as an example of a company looking to skip the mining.

We don't really need stuff to carry over, besides that the source of most hydrogen is fossil fuel based. See the IEA report for a fair and reasonable assessment.

Electricity infra is already installed almost everywhere in the world. When I lived in California, I saw exactly 2 stations which offered pressurized hydrogen.