196

16423 readers

2776 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1137

Rule (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While it’s definitely true they could’ve intercepted comms, I don’t know that they did do that. And telescopes would only get them to confirming things up to orbit probably.

I still think it’s likely they knew it was real, I’ve just never been able to confirm that they did for myself and so the argument I’m using it much weaker without that piece of evidence. Not to mention that Russia has had state actors promoting the conspiracy theory in recent years which makes things confusing

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well it's certainly not proof per se*, but considering all the bugs and spies the USSR planted it seems like a no brainer that they would be listening in on any and all unencrypted over the air communications.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just FYI, the phrase is "per se", not "per say". It's Latin for "by itself".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just FYI, Not according to my android keyboard's autocorrect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Maybe it has learned from previous occasions. Mine doesn't suggest either option.