this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
69 points (72.3% liked)

World News

32290 readers
1157 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (6 children)

My downvote wasn't in anger. It's more about the fact that this isn't a news article which makes it questionably breaking the rules of this /c/. Combined with the headline being serious editorializing via broad generalization of what the statement is. Not saying it's not true, just that it's a unnecessarily sensational.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

i-spil-my-jice MODS MODS an official statement from a politician isn't news 3 tiny paragraphs have to be filtered through a journalist or i can't read it

the headline being serious editorializing

what do journalists do i wonder blob-no-thoughts

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a press release from the White House. Why would you need a journalist to stenograph it for it to become news?

And OP's description is good, it helps cut through the typical liberal mealy-mouthed framings that are, otherwise, the only ones you would ever hear.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

But who will chew up this statement and feed it to me like a baby bird. How am I supposed to form an opinion without a media propagandist telling me what to think!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Why would you need a journalist to stenograph it for it to become news?

Because like Yogthos said, the only consumption liberals do comes pre-digested by the Jake Tappers, Rachel Maddows, and Wolf Blitzers of the world. It'd be funny in a disgusting way if these milquetoast know-nothing partisans didn't have hands on the levers of the world.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be honest i would trust Yogthos who has been posting news threads for years than some paid journalists that has an agenda to whatever news they report. It resembles the old forum era where if you hang around long enough, you can trust/trust a little some users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Trust no one, especially not yourself. Fuck that guy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

...this isn't a news article... the headline being serious editorializing... Not saying it's not true...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

I think you might be the worst person ever

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I downvoted and I'm not angry. I just recognize that this post is intentionally inflammatory and trolling. As is common from OP.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why is it inflammatory? As a mod I'm genuinely surprised people are upset by this, it is a white house press statement with an editorialized title that summarizes the event quickly and without any commentary on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You said it in your reply. An editorialized title--an extremely editorialized title, which was clearly crafted specifically to garner outrage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I dont see it garnering outrage? It seems in line with what Kamala Harris said.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Posting news in a news comm of a presidential speech that is literally a link to the official government website of that president is "intentionally inflammatory and trolling"? This is a joke, right? You're doing a bit and playing a caricature of a typical lib clown?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the title that is inflammatory and trolling. Do you really not understand that editorializing is a thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you really not understand that titling any fucking post ever is doing the same thing? Fucking clown.

If the title was a NYT headline with two words changed: "Kamala Harris makes an official statement in condemnation of political terrorism" you wouldn't be clutching your pearls, now would you? OP's title is far more factual though, and that's what you actually don't like. You people are so transparent it's laughable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You sound ridiculous.