this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
618 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
4728 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
618
Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
199 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The SDK was never FOSS, and was never under the GPL. Hence why they can add the text mentioned in the article. You don't get to change the text of a FOSS license to begin with. It isn't unheard of for text like this to be part of proprietary software that integrates with and uses FOSS that are under different licenses.

That said, this is concerning, but whether it changes BW's FOSS state is a matter of legal bickering that has been going on for decades.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

You can’t retroactively change FOSS licensing, but oft times you can alter the licensing moving forward. Not always the case, of course. But in no way are all FOSS licenses set in stone.