this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
79 points (76.9% liked)

Games

16651 readers
1144 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this might start war in the comments so please chill people, I don't want to get 20 reports from this single post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You didn't read the article did you? Its not about the inclusion of a character, but about how a specific scene with that character is handled. The author claims it is completely jarring, doesn't fit into the games setting and doesn't even use the games existing lore for transgender people but instead uses modern terminology.

I found the article to very informative and not at all "gamergatey".

Its points are:

  • this is the scene
  • it is bad
  • here is exelent trans representation in a fantasy setting
  • "its a BioWare self insert"
  • this is how they could have handled it better
  • the game is great, but now everybody will just talk about woke, so again the game is good
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time I say the horseshoe theory is stupid I open a forum and am proven wrong...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Means someone cited gamergate where it makes no sense at all.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol. The admonishment for "misusing" gamergate by citing horseshoe theory as if it's in any way applicable is hilariously on point. Good luck with that "enlightened" centrism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's ok to be wrong. It's how we grow. Being right all the time is boring and delusional.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

Arguing a single point ≠ claiming to be "right all the time". What's your next condescending bit of "advice" that's totally not a poorly disguised character attack?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What centrism? Calling out the bourgeoisie invented themes to distract from the class struggles is the duty of every reasonable person, more so if they are on the left. Human rights are not debatable, you vote for the representative that abides human rights. If none is available, you start a revolution. What you don't do is use a neoliberal dear to proselytise as if you're not part of the problem by perpetuating the system that abuses the people you're soapboxing about. (you, as in, Bioware, not you, this is not meant as a personal attack, I came to lemmy to talk to reasonable people)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May I interpret this as a personal attack anyway, please? I'd like something to get angry about for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago