this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
157 points (97.0% liked)
microthoughts
1343 readers
1 users here now
basically twitter -- post little microblogs, microthoughts about your day or life or the culture
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
and that militarization hasn’t done a thing to improve security
Tldw, but what about deterrent effects? Not sure how they could ever be measured.
it’s called “security theater” for a reason – fine as long as you don’t look behind the curtain – TSA gets to bully those who pose no danger and the ones who pose a danger already know it’s all an act
TSA isn't even the one making the airport feel like a militarized zone. Most agents aren't allowed to be armed nor have any more power than regular citizens. They are the same as a bouncer of a club. I don't know about the USA but in most countries it's either the police or the military providing the protection.
Airport and flying safety has improved significantly over the past few years. Plane hijackings used to be way more common pre 9-11. The reason why 9-11 worked was because there was a protocol in place on how to deal with hijackings. And that was to follow the demands of the hijackers. Because this would safe the most lives.
Today the protocol has changed. Pilots will never open the cockpit door, no matter what the hijackers are threatening or actually doing to passengers. And ironically this also means that the TSA does a better job than most assume. Because the main priority is to ensure hijackers can't get into the cockpit. Bringing any equipment onto a plane that could help tearing down that door is almost certainly going to be detected by the screening.