this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28219 readers
386 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Frequently, I need to answer the question, "Is this source of information reliable?". Lately, I have been thinking that a decentralized platform to post reviews for websites and see aggregated statistics about those reviews would be pretty useful.

While I am open to any suggestions, the software being OSS and decentralized is important for me to consider the platform reliable.

Also, I believe the optimal review platform should hold at least ratings, tags, and text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think ANY platform for reviews is going to get gamed and flooded with fake reviews. I don't see how decentralization would solve that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not true, I could set up a WordPress blog and start writing reviews. As long as it stays a niche thing I share with a couple of friends online, that "review platform" won't be gamed or flooded by fake reviews.

My point being that closed "publishing" instances can be reliable.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Sure, there can absolutely be reliable sources of reviews. The problem is in verifying what is reliable and what isn't. Why in the hell would I ever trust some random dude's WordPress blog as a reliable source of reviews? I would have no way of knowing that companies aren't paying you or giving you free products.

Outside of something like consumer reports, which has built up a reputation over a long period of time, how does one figure out that a source is reliable? Review the reviewers? Those reviews would just get gamed too.