this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
112 points (96.7% liked)

science

14678 readers
219 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
  • Received: 31 August 2021
  • Accepted: 30 June 2023

So the research on this article is already 2 years old, but only now was it published…

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you look at the peer review file, you'll see that they spent a year improving the paper after sever critical criticisms were made by the reviewers. They've collected more data and entirely redid the analysis. It's a different paper now compared to their first manuscript of 2021.