the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
view the rest of the comments
tobacco companies in China remove nitrosamines from their tobacco, while amerikan companies dont. this makes Chinese cigarettes considerably less carcinogenic than amerikan cigs
Peak. Performance.
This is what i aspire to be on my morning jogs.
Thats coz uhmrica is the so called free market !
B U T A T W H A T C O S T ?
not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source on this? I wanna save it for libs
this study shows the average nitrosamine concentration in Chinese cigarettes is 70 ng/cigarette, with the lowest at 10. this study shows that only 2 of the tested amerikan cigarettes contain less nitrosamines than the Chinese average, at 55 and 66 ng/cigarette. and there are 10 that exceed 300, with a high of 460! the most dangerous Chinese cigarette was at 261