this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1380 points (97.5% liked)

Antiwork

3624 readers
92 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/[email protected]

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/[email protected]


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you gave the Ford CEOs income evenly among all the employees, it would be an extra $200 a year.

CEO-to-worker pay ratio isn't a particularly useful metric but it does a good job making people rightfully angry.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the point, which you're missing, is that nobody should be making that much money at a company.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fair enough but the "we don't have the money" part is what doesn't really make sense. CEO compensation, however egregious, is still a very small part of total payroll.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ok, now add in all the other C-suite execs and the board of directors

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The board of directors is not on payroll, they're the owners, they get dividends or can sell part of the actions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Shilling for millionaires?

Fuck off yo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not meant to be taken literally, it's meant to show how ridiculously inverted the current distribution of wealth and resources is in virtually all major US industries. The point is that the money is there. It's just getting sucked up to the top.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you're saying we'd only need to sacrifice the pay of one guy to get free or mostly-paid-off utilities or groceries or gas for an entire month for hundreds of thousands of people? Seems like a worthy sacrifice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think @[email protected] is saying CEOs should be defended, but rather that their income isn't a good measure for the rate of exploitation, because a great part of the companies profits that aren't retained are divided among the shareholders, that is arguably where the greatest theft lies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We need to sacrifice the shareholders. You know, the real victims here...

#fuckyourdividends

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reich also went out his way to screw the working class. Citing him just shows someone is citing someone that is saying what they want to hear.

He went out of his way to screw people when he was in power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least he got minimum wage increased

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He did not such thing. Congress has the power to set the minimum wage. Maybe you need to brush up on how bad this man destroyed the middle class.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, he didn't specifically himself pass it, but he was Secretary of Labor and he lobbied for it. He's also the reason we have FMLA.

I don't think it's fair to say he "destroyed" the middle class.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fmla is garbage. 12 weeks of unpaid time off

Yes it provides job protection but many people can’t afford that much unpaid time off.

It’s fair. He went against the unions to push nafta through which decimated the middle class. We say lots of high paying manufacturing jobs move to Mexico and Canada. That decimated the middle class and he knew it. You either defend unions or you don’t. He didn’t. It destroyed the middle class last

https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/#:~:text=By%20establishing%20the%20principle%20that,end%20of%20World%20War%20II.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Can you recommend a place to start brushing up on that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In what way did Robert Reich of all people "go out of his way to screw the working class"?

This should be good..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guessing it's this:

Throughout his first year in office, Reich was a leading proponent of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was negotiated by the George H. W. Bush administration and supported by Clinton following two side agreements negotiated to satisfy labor and environmental groups. Reich served as leading public and private spokesman for the Clinton administration against organized labor, who continued to oppose the Agreement as a whole.

In July 1993, Reich said that the unions were "just plain wrong" to suggest NAFTA would cause a loss of American employment and predicted that "given the pace of growth of the Mexican automobile market over the next 15 years, I would say that more automobile jobs would be created in the United States than would be lost to Mexico... [T]he American automobile industry will grow substantially, and the net effect will be an increase in automobile jobs." He further argued that trade liberalization following World War II had led to the "biggest increase in jobs and standard of living among the industrialized nations [in] history. "[31]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds more like him being wrong and/or lied to by the Clinton administration that was mostly far to the right of him on just about anything than any sort of malice on his part, much less "going out of his way to screw the working class"..