Starfield

2860 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Now that we've had SF for a bit, what do you think? Good, flawed, bad? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am going to try and say something I haven't yet seen in this thread.

The ship builder gets a big like for me because I always wanted to wander around big spaceships. I really like the fact that I can walk around the interiors and build my own designs, even if I'm bad at it.
The POIs are identical, and that's horrible. As much emphasis was put on exploration, this is even a bigger disappointment, because once you've seen one X, you'seen every X, down to every single entity placement. This really kills the joy of the entire game for me and I feel angry thinking back to Howard's words about how the game could be played for hours, months, years - like, doing what, exactly?

Aside from that, yeah, pretty much what everybody said: dialogue is boring and censored (like, advertiser/stakeholder friendly), the game is very "take it safe" in important regards, but there's enough story and quests to have fun with the mechanics that actually work.

Overall, it's flawed, but a definite 6/10 - it's just not the game Bethesda made us think it is, again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like the idea of the ship builder, but it falls short just enough to be irritating to me.

Why cant I rotate habs to have hallways run perpendicular to the ship? Why don't decorative structure pieces give better hull health/armor/whatever? Why cant the description of the the non engine/reactor/shield/gravdrive modules give me more, critical need-to-know information? Like what work benches this module have, how much tonnage does this landing gear support (so you can easily resolve irritatingly vague build error messages), Why cant I control where doors and ladders go, so I dont have to basically navigate an MC Esher painting to get from the cockpit to my captains quarters?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one thinking about these things - I've seen many people complaining about then in other places as well.

If only that convinced Bethesda to patch the ship builder and make it a true masterpiece...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To busy removing vendor chests so people cant play their single player games wrong, lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's unironically much simpler, easier, and quicker compared to what you and I want. I the development world, stuff that's quick and easy to fix often gets a higher priority so people just over it and focus on something that takes much more attention and resources for a longer period of time.

But I'm basically coping here because I really do hope they come around to enhancing the ship builder to be even more customizable and robust. At least lemme choose my door and ladders placement.