Statecraft

171 readers

65 users here now

URL has to point to the actual article
Body has to have an archive link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What is happening with US Government? (lemmy.cafe)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems every couple of years it's in danger to shut down. Is this a genuine thing, a political play or something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight.

Congress approves a budget.
Congress is aware of the spending approved in that budget.
Congress is unhappy about a need to increase the debt ceiling to accommodate the spending they themselves approved.

Is that really the thing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Congress approves a budget.

They create and approve it. Pres can suggest budget implying that Pres won't veto the type of stuff in the suggested budget. Pres can veto, but they can overrule with 2/3 vote.

Congress is aware of the spending approved in that budget.

Aware is not strong enough of a term. They created the spending and deficit. It's like the difference between being aware of the algorithms that choose YouTube videos and being the engineer that makes them. There's a little more evil involved in the latter. Especially when they know a shutdown literally causes suffering.

Congress is unhappy about a need to increase the debt ceiling to accommodate the spending they themselves approved.

No, they're not unhappy about it. They love that they create an emergency only they can solve. Then every network talking head gets to do their streamer outrage review impressions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then every network talking head gets to do their streamer outrage review impressions.

Surely that gets boring pretty quickly. Can citizens do anything to get rid of the ceiling?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Surely that gets boring pretty quickly.

If it bleeds it leads. You might think it's boring. I might think it's boring, but on the whole outrage sells. It sells attention.

This isn't new. Been a race to the bottom of outrage 24/7 for a while now. There used to be news reporting requirements. This is getting off topic, but read up on the Fairness Doctrine. Reagan removed it in the 80s. This essentially allowed echo chambers on national tv.

Edit: note that the doctrine wasn't perfect, but in my opinion it's better than nothing. Remember the debates back in 2016? The hosts said they weren't there to fact check. Having no doctrine meant they could air whatever they wanted without rebuttal or responsibilities, and sell some premium ad time during the debates.

It'll never be boring unless lawmakers force it to be boring. Advertises want their ads to be seen. Organizations that peddle outrage get the most eyeballs. Some might argue we shouldn't allow lawmakers to fight the market forces that created the outrage eyeballs dynamic we have today. The dynamic we have today was created by lawmakers to begin with.

Can citizens do anything to get rid of the ceiling?

Vote. Start assassinating media mogul billionaires that profit from outrage eyeballs. Call your representatives. Think critically and be open to change. Any one or a combination of those things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have heard of the Fairness Doctrine. I think it was a great thing.

I'm not from US myself, but I'm still sceptical a bunch of calls to reps will do anything. I do like the other options, though!