this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
665 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

31823 readers
361 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/6469594

How to contact your MEP.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What is wrong with the eu? Why do they need to always ban end to end encryption?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lobbiests are probably the one reason they haven't passed such anti-privacy laws, actually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There’s lobbying on both sides

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As I remember at the moment partly Von Der Leyen, the current Commission president. She is a German Christian democrat and apparently bit with capital C. Meaning she has bit of a moral panic streak on her of the "won't you think of the children" variety. As I understand this current proposal is very much driven by her.

However her driving it doesn't mean it sail through to pass as legislation. Some whole memberstate governments are against the encryption busting idea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And the fact that Ylva Johansson, being technologically illiterate as well as a close bed buddy with companies in the surveillance industry that stand to earn a crap load of money doesn't help...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Von Der Leyen is a swinger clubber

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure they will tell you it's weighing the security (against terrorists, criminals, etc) of the many against the security (from seeing dick pics or messaging a mistress) of the few.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The thing that always kills me about that phrase is "the needs of the many" are "the needs of the few," because "the many" is just a gaggle of "fews."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

5 eyes. Politicians are puppets.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wait, you have a choice to vote for either puppet 1, puppet 2, or puppet 3. Your choice matters! .. as long as the politicians podiums are provided by the rich we don't have a real say.