World News

38968 readers

2421 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

945

Australia rejects proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in constitution (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

417 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah until the Liberals dismantle it. again.

[–] Whirlybird 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The liberals would have dismanted the constitutionally protected voice anyway, because the only thing that was protected is that it has to exist. No mention of the makeup of it, how people would be chosen, or even that the people on it need to be indigenous. The LNP get power and it wouldn't be unexpected to see peter dutton as the sole member of the Voice advisory panel.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no doubt that they would have stacked it. All governments try and do that, it's not always malicious.

A yes vote would have indicated that the people feel quite strongly about it working though, and made it more heavily scrutinised when fiddled with.

"The constitutional voice" has a lot more gravity in a headline than "the indigenous advisory committee" or whatever, and news orgs are in the business of headlines.

Lets not sugar coat it, it's a black day on our nation's history.

[–] Whirlybird 2 points 1 year ago

Lets not sugar coat it, it’s a black day on our nation’s history.

It's really not. We voted against something that we thought was a shit idea. If it was just about recognizing indigenous people as the original owners of the land etc it would have passed with flying colours. The government tried to bundle it with a vague and shitty proposal though, and in the process lost the recognition.