this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
68 points (98.6% liked)
Green Energy
2182 readers
39 users here now
everything about energy production
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think we still need nuclear, including new nuclear, as a backup. It's easy to imagine a scenario, e.g., a still winter night, where any amount of renewables would fail to provide enough energy, and in that scenario we'd want something we could switch on. Nuclear is the obvious answer!
It’s easy to imagine a scenario, e.g., regions of france for weeks at a time during four of the last ten years, where any amount of nuclear would fail to provide enough energy, and in that scenario we’d want something we could switch on.
The transmission, backup and storage requirements are no different for nuclear vs. renewables. Even a solution as bad as burning the gas and coal we'd use while waiting for nuclear to be built as backup over the next four centuries is much more sane.