this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
767 points (92.0% liked)

Political Memes

5414 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 84 points 11 months ago (25 children)

Just tax billionaires and we can have all of the above and a surplus budget.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago (4 children)

How about we tax billionaires and also not give giant gifts to defense companies every year?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (8 children)

unless conflicts end worldwide I want my country to maintain the highest level of military technology and local capacity to ramp up if needed. That being said I don't want my country involved with every conflict in the world.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If the USA wouldn't be randomly invading countries every few years, they could keep the same level of military technology while spending much less.

The Iraq war did nothing to increase the US military's capabilities but just wasted enourmous amounts of money while killing civilians on a daily basis.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah but it also gave us the Saddam Hussein outline meme.

Trillions well spent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

NCD user spotted

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

that's not how technology works, stuff will get outdated if we use it or not

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

for sure. To boot that was done while backgrounding afganistan which was the main 9/11 thing and caused it to go on forever since it was neglected.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's up with Americans never mentioning Afghanistan anymore like it wasn't the first place that got invaded after 9/11???

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

it is much mentioned a bunch by our right on how bad the left president did finally extricating ourselves from the thing they started (and of course lets not forget what president actually eliminated osama)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Good news, they could reduce it by 400 billion a year and still spend more than the the other 3 biggest spenders combined

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a Finn I don't want the US to stop fully... but they have a huge amount of excess, it's insane how much money they waste

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Understandable

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If it's at the expense of everything else that could help the state of the country and quality of life, what's the point?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure the U.S. can do that without an $816.7 billion defense budget, much of which goes to giant corporations, and without being larger than the next 20 militaries combined.

How about we do a $400 billion defense budget and only be larger than the next 10?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

, much of which goes to giant corporations, and without being larger than the next 20 militaries combined.

The biggest expenses, by far, are personnel costs and maintenance. The idea that the defense budget is a giant gift to contractors is just not backed up by evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

oh yeah but that is still money to defense companies. What you said here is pretty much what I meant. Just enough to maintain top tech levels and ability to ramp up and thats it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I want my country to maintain the highest level of military technology and local capacity to ramp up if needed

There is N-word that will burn some asses: nationalize.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Watching Ukraine absolutely stonewall Russia using cold era tech has been incredible. Imagine what modern equipment could do. I can't wait to see what happens when they get f-16s, which were developed in the mid 70s by the way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

The last time US was involved in a war that even remotely had something to do with US was WWII. Before that it was probably civil war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

not give giant gifts to defense companies

There is N-word that will burn some asses on lemmy.world: nationalize.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, because that for sure will stop other world powers from arming themselves and attacking others.

And to answer upcoming question: why we should care not others instead of ourselves. No one attacks us militarily (we are attacked via hubris warfare with disinformation such as this though) because we are armed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

defense companies

You mean mercenaries and arms dealers. The only thing they're defending is their profits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not just billionaires; corporations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

If we consider corporations people (and the Supreme Courts says we have to) then we should tax their income. That means total income, not profits because I don't pay taxes on what's left over after my bills, so why should corps get to?

load more comments (23 replies)