this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
46 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3583 readers
49 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All seven justices of the High Court were of the opinion that indefinite immigration detention for people with no prospect of deportation was unlawful, according to reasons published by the court this afternoon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


All seven justices of the High Court were of the opinion that indefinite immigration detention for people with no prospect of deportation was unlawful, according to reasons published by the court this afternoon.

The decision centred on the case of a Rohingya man, who had been in immigration detention after serving a sentence for child sex offences and could not be deported.

The ruling was handed down earlier this month, and overturned a two-decade-old precedent effectively allowing indefinite detention.

The High Court’s reasons show the judges decided to overturn that case from 2004 because they found it was “incomplete and, accordingly, inaccurate” in suggesting that indefinite detention was lawful because it made someone available for deportation at some later stage.

The judges said the principle couldn’t apply if other countries weren’t prepared to accept someone Australia wanted to deport.


The original article contains 139 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The original article contains 139 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 0%.

Solid effort!

[–] Zagorath 3 points 11 months ago

To be clear, that's a bug. The actual article is much longer.