this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
284 points (87.6% liked)

politics

19094 readers
3702 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not."

That's gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I've heard in a while.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (39 children)

and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.

This thread indicates not.

Centrist Democrats have never considered that a party is obligated to represent people whose votes it needs.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t really understand this. The republican position is clearly pro-Israeli, anti-Palestinian. What are they hoping to achieve by destabilizing Biden?

I’m not a Biden fan, but he is clearly less detrimental to their position that the alternative…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (20 children)

You don't understand that people don't want to participate in a system where both choices require them to take active participation in what they see as genocide of their own people?

Or you just don't see how anyone could possibly oppose genocide?

In either case, you certainly didn't show any evidence at all that you have given any consideration whatsoever to the idea that a party is obligated to represent people whose votes it needs.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You've only got three options.

  1. Pick Gun A. Someone shoots 8 people with Gun A.

  2. Pick Gun B. Someone shoots 20 people with Gun B.

  3. Don't pick either gun. Other people decide which gun will be used. Someone shoots either 8 or 20 people with the chosen gun.

If I don't want people to die, what should I pick? Should I pick Gun A because I want to make sure the fewest people die? Or should I not pick at all, so that I can feel good about myself if gun B is chosen and 20 people die?

I'm sympathetic to them, but refusing to participate in the system doesn't mean the system goes away. It just means you pretend you don't have blood on your hands. If you care about keeping the Palestinian death toll as low as possible, you vote for the option that will kill the fewest. That's voting for Biden. Choose not to vote, and the death toll may be higher.

Blood will be on my hands no matter what I pick. I choose to see and accept that blood, if it means even one life is saved that would be doomed otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I suppose congrats are in order. We have a real life Trolley Problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (7 children)

If you don't need their votes, keep acting like you can order them to vote like you want. You can always blame them for the results, but you'll still have the results.

The party would rather lose to Trump and have someone to blame than try to appeal to the voters it regards with withering contempt. It may make you feel morally superior to scream at people, but that doesn't move the needle in the direction you need.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much. If fascism takes over America centrist Democrats will be partly to blame

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Won't stop them from blaming all the people they alienated.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Weird so many in this thread seem to think if you insult people for not wanting to be genocided, they'll support the candidate you like. Make it feel more clear that these people don't actually care about them and just see them as pawns for their own goals.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Weird so many in this thread seem to think if you insult people for not wanting to be genocided, they’ll support the candidate you like.

"Vote for me to do shit you hate, moron! Wait... why are you staying home?"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)