this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
359 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59151 readers
3094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is that Microsoft is phasing out AD and Exchange by making the licensing costs prohibitively more expensive than just using their cloud identity, mail, and SaaS services.

We are still on prem for AD but that’s due to legacy software that requires it and will be that way for a while but cost will eventually have us on a cloud identity provider and it will probably be Azure

We already are on exchange online, the costs just don’t make sense to host exchange on premises unless you have a legacy reason too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I really want to respond to your comment and go in more depth as to how my work situation is with AD groups etc etc

I just don't want to be careless and speak more about the particular infrastructure of my company's workflow than I need to

Suffice to say, we are continuing to move assets to a cloud hosting service. Due to our unique solution, we still require AD groups.

Funny enough, we need the AD groups for the cloud assets to run as expected. It's a different kind of authorization on-prem