Technology

59132 readers

4134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What Improvements Would You Like To See In Free/Libre, Open Source Music Software? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey guys, forgive me if I'm posting in the wrong place, but I have a talent for understanding audio very well. I just finished implementing a sequencer and a synthesizer in C, just for fun. Now that I'm done, I feel pretty good about this project, and I feel like there's no reason not to keep going, but I don't know what to work on next. I love free software, so I'd love to fill in the gaps that may cause a person to prefer to buy a proprietary synthesizer over downloading a free one. Do you have any ideas?

Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

If you are a guitar enthusiast, TuxGuitar could use some features to help it catch up to where guitar pro was at version 4. Not sure how feasible that is.

Arobas has essentially rendered old .gp# tabs obsolete as their playback on new versions of GP is broken AF. Vibrato is weird, markers are bugged, its a bummer. I've been on GP5 since it was released and I refuse to update regardless of how "good" the new versions are.