Technology

59151 readers

3377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

282

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There were a dozen companies that applied for the grant. Musk won by over promising.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Not just that, he used star link to manage international relations by suddenly stopping service for Ukraine.

He's a "free speech abolitionist" and egotistical megalomaniac that's willing lie about deliverables and take illegal actions because there's been no punishment.

Here's punishment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you are expanding the deep state to include regulatory bodies, you are just talking about the state.

Can you provide an instance of the state ever hiding the fact that they regulate businesses, or did you just find out that was one of their powers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think I misunderstood you the first time. I thought you were a musk fan boy claiming the regulators themselves were the deepstate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

deleted

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well he never won in the first place. This is the original final decision of him losing in the first place. What was "won" previously was SpaceX getting short listed as one of the companies to be seriously considered for award. Then followed the actual final full decision checks and SpaceX failed to meet criterion for the subsidy.