this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
422 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When some people have argued that there is no use for EU, I have used its handling of technology giants as a counter-argument.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It does increasingly feel like the EU is the only institution that has any willingness to stand up to big tech.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Another thing I point out is "look no further than the bottom of your phone" to bring up how EU forced phone manufacturers to use USB-C.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Good thing that didn’t happen during USB Micro. That was one of if not the worst connector invented.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

A shame the writers of the law didn't have good enough knowledge of the underlying technology to mandate not just the USB C connector, but specific USB C standards. The fact that USB C cables are very much "you can't even tell what it does without plugging it in" is a bit of a nightmare.

But on the other hand, there's always changes for further revisions in the future.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And fortunately they made the law future proof. It doesn't say that "hey, you should use USB-C" but it says "hey, you should use the connector mentioned in Appendix H which is defined by committee R". That way they don't need to start over the whole bureaucratic process the pass the law, just ask a committee to reevaluate the tech and they change the appendix. It can be USB-D from tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I never had a problem with MicroUSB and haven't really seen a benefit to USB-C for basic charging of devices. I guess some might charge faster, but USB-C is so screwed up that you need a magic mix of cable, charger and device to get more than baseline anyway, it works the same as MicroUSB for me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I’ve had and seen many a device get ruined when the fragile connector breaks off. Combined with the slower charging, lower speed transfer, one way design that isn’t as obvious, etc.

And yes, I’d rather have lightning over usb-c as at least the lightning cables have consistent standards.