this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
189 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13505 readers
29 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
189
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

essentialist definitions of the west based on racial categories

Yes this is how the West defines itself.

you can ask anyone in the latin america world, which is hundreds of millions of people, and they'll tell you they're western due to historic and cultural and religious ties.

I agree entirely.

why even bring up the germany ww1 portrayal thing are you trying to argue that germany wasn't western until after ww1?

The point is that "Western" is a changing category (for those outside the five eyes anyway) without any rigorously defined criteria. Russia is a good recent example.

your argument against that is because you can imagine some reactionary in america or europe who would disagree?

I don't need to imagine that, and they do disagree. And the reason why what a reactionary thinks matters is because they are unfortunately have a great deal of power.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

The point is that "Western" is a changing category (for those outside the five eyes anyway) without any rigorously defined criteria. Russia is a good recent example.

It's not a changing category. It's just Europe.

Within Europe, those borders can change. But nothing outside of Europeans (including European Americans) will ever be treated as "Western"