this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
876 points (94.3% liked)

Gaming

3071 readers
1042 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Nintendo and Sony's free options were junk. Microsoft mage a product so much better than the free alternatives that people were willing to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Better than on pc, where it was completely free?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

In many ways, yes. It was , and still is to some degree, massively more convenient for the couch gamers. That is what you pay for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Nintendo's paid option is still garbage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sony's free options were junk

Not during the PS2 era. FF11, EverQuest Adventures, THPS, MGSO1, Splinter Cell Mercs vs Spies... Quite possibly the best era of online console gaming, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, didn't all of those have publisher-run infrastructure to make it work? There wasn't a "Sony Online" presence like there was for the PS3 and later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They had DNAS about a year into the life of the online services, which acted as a middleman and DRM. Those were run by Sony themselves.

Even now, don't publishers and developers handle everything for their own servers once the Microsoft or Sony servers pass them off to the game itself? Most of the games I have for PS right now just use bullshit P2P systems; me or some other player are basically hosting the server in those cases, and I still have to pay extra for it.

Also I just thought about how totally F2P games like Rocket League and Fortnite do not actually require the PS+, Nintendo Online or Xbox Gold (or whatever it's called these days) subscription to play.