this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
80 points (100.0% liked)

history

23064 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (7 children)

This really undersells how batshit insane Mormon history is. Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were massive fans of the ephedra plant, aka ephedrine. They were the OG tweaker cult. First off, the fucking gold tablets. Book of Mormon is a translated set of gold tablets with "hieroglyphics" that Smith just found in the woods. While many laypeople believe these gold tablets to be forgeries created by the church, this simply isn't the case. The truth is far worse. The gold tablets are from an indigenous kingdom that had long since disappeared. Obviously, these weren't hieroglyphics, but how the fuck would Smith know? He doesn't know hieroglyphics or the lost language on the tablet. So he just kinda fuckin freeballed it while getting high as fuck on ephedrine. That's literally the base of the entire religion

Another thing that I literally could not make up if I tried. After Smith died and the Mormons ruled Utah, they tried making their own alphabet. The fucking letter G is an among us that is pronounced "gay". Their "promised land" literally had a giant saltwater lake. When they settled, they got completely overran by Mormon crickets, bugs that can swarm up to 100 in a square meter.

This isn't even getting into how Brigham Young made Joseph Smith look like a saint. Dude had like 10x more wives than Smith, and is thought to have killed 1/5th of his children. Also declared war on the federal government to try to claim Utah as New Zion. OH BOY THAT REMINDED ME OF MORMON ZIONISM. Mormons are Zionists, but don't use the term to refer to Israel. They actually think Utah/Arizona are the Mormon promised land. When I was younger, they got pissed off at Jewish Zionism for being fakes.

I know quite a bit about Mormons as someone who was raised by them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

they got pissed off at Jewish Zionism for being fakes

Amazing

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Black Israelites 🤝 Mormons

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I always love to tell people that Smith was known for raiding local indigenous graveyards in upper New York and when he was not doing that he was scammimg people with water dousing services.

I tell people if they are in Utah to visit the Gilgal Sculpture Garden. They have a Sphinx with a head in the shape of Smith.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Joseph Smith was one of the greatest grifters to ever do it, honestly. One of the most transparent yet successful grifts I've ever seen. Mormon culture is a fucking fever dream that feels like living in what the west says North Korea is. Some of the shit he got away with would be extremely comedic if there weren't victims. Getting your prophecies from a paper bag is fucking hilarious. The way he pushed polygamy in his relationship was so fucking funny. All accounts of Joseph Smith's speaking make me feel like he was the proto George Santos where the grift is just so fucking absurd that I can't help but laugh. I bet Smith could have convinced his people that he shat gold.

Brigham Young is just a straight monster though. He wasn't funny, just evil.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Yea Brigham Young was a special type of monster because of how he viewed slavery as something that can be eternal in nature. Just imaging some guy telling you that after you die you are still going to be his slave. Mormon slavery was so huge that they founded towns around it like San Bernardino.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

While many laypeople believe these gold tablets to be forgeries created by the church, this simply isn't the case. The truth is far worse. The gold tablets are from an indigenous kingdom that had long since disappeared

The way I always heard it is that the plates never existed, not that they were taken from an indigenous kingdom. In fact, it's the Mormons themselves who insist that the plates were created by an man from an indigenous American tribe called the Nephites who were originally from Israel. The full title of the book of Mormon is "The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon upon Plates Taken from the Plates of Nephi," Mormon being the name of the indigenous man who supposedly created the plates.

Smith said that he found the plates on September 22, 1823, on a hill near his home in Manchester, New York, after the angel Moroni directed him to a buried stone box. He said that the angel prevented him from taking the plates but instructed him to return to the same location in a year. He returned to that site every year, but it was not until September 1827 that he recovered the plates on his fourth annual attempt to retrieve them. He returned home with a heavy object wrapped in a frock, which he then put in a box. He allowed others to heft the box but said that the angel had forbidden him to show the plates to anyone until they had been translated from their original "reformed Egyptian" language.

Smith dictated the text of the plates while a scribe wrote down the words which would later become the Book of Mormon. Eyewitnesses to the process said Smith translated the plates, not by looking directly at them, but by looking through a transparent seer stone in the bottom of his hat.

Smith eventually obtained testimonies from 11 men who said that they had seen the plates, known as the Book of Mormon witnesses. After the translation was complete, Smith said that he returned the plates to the angel Moroni; thus, they could never be examined.

It seems to me that he simply filled a random box with heavy objects, wouldn't let anyone look at what was inside, "translated" the plates by looking at a "seer stone" in his hat, and then "gave the plates (which probably never existed) back to the angel Moroni." He curated "witnesses" (loyal Mormons) who would vouch for him.

There doesn't seem to be any evidence that Smith actually found any kind of indigenous artifacts. The evidence points towards him simply insisting that he got plates from an "angel" and then "gave them back" when he was done "translating" them, i.e., dictating his ideas to a loyal fellow Mormon.

I'm not saying that it's impossible that indigenous North Americans could have possibly produced such an object, however:

To date "no one has found evidence that points to the use of melting, smelting and casting in prehistoric eastern North America."

and

Archaeological evidence has not revealed metal smelting or alloying of metals by pre-Columbian native peoples north of the Rio Grande; however, they did use native copper extensively.

Most artifacts of gold come from Central/South America. Could you provide a source for your claims that the tablets were real in the first place? If anything, the Mormon telling of the story doesn't really conflict with your idea anyway, since the Mormon interpretation is that indigenous Americans are a lost tribe Israelites. Joseph Smith never argued that the plates were made by non-indigenous people, but rather that indigenous people are Israelites. That of course comes with its own separate baggage, but he never claimed that his (likely non existent) golden plates were non-indigenous in origin. The book of Mormon claims that the tablets were created by an indigenous American man named Mormon who was a member of a tribe called the Nephites. Joseph Smith of course made all that shit up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The point I'm trying to make is that even if everything the church says is true, Smith's reported translation techniques are absolutely fucking ridiculous and invalidates anything he wrote. I can't say where I live, but you seem to know about mormonism so I'm just gonna mention that god damn tree and hope you know where I'm talking about. They show tablets up here, I saw them in the museum as a kid. RLDS and COC are huge up here, so Mormons have to come up with something to make themselves not look stupid. Whether or not JS actually used them is questionable, but the modern church definitely has tablets in a museum that I've seen indigenous people claim as their people's tablets. My writing mostly does agree with church history, because I think JS is one of the funniest grifters to ever grift because of how blatantly ridiculous the grift is.

The truth of the Mormon church barely even matters because their lies are just so blatantly stupid. However, I'd say that even if this is just a local myth because of where I live. Their accounts of the situations don't make them look good. It's like the church actually showing the "seers stone"? Their own account of history makes them look like massive idiots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Smith's reported translation techniques are absolutely fucking ridiculous and invalidates anything he wrote

Right. I brought up that he looked into his hat. He didn't have tablets to translate in the first place. He claims an angel led him to them, and that he gave them back to the angel when he was done with them. There were no techniques of translation. Joseph Smith was illiterate. He claimed to translate the tablets using divination, and he had a loyal church Mormon write down what he dictated while looking into his hat. So not only did Smith not read anything, he didn't write anything either. The Mormon tradition started with the oration of Joseph Smith, which he claimed to be translating tablets that he was led to by an angel by using divine powers. But he never showed anyone the actual tablets. Perhaps he was planning on having some tablets forged eventually but never got around to it and finally gave up and said that he gave them back to the angel. In the 1840s there were some attempts by people to fake Smith's tablets by putting Egyptian hieroglyphs on brass plates, but these were fairly quickly proven to be forged.

They show tablets up here, I saw them in the museum as a kid.

Right, those are artistic reproductions by the church.

Not even the church claims that the tablets they have in the museum are the originals. Because there are no originals. Joseph Smith claimed an angel led him to the tablets, and that he eventually gave the tablets back to the angel, and that nobody else was allowed to see them. I'm sure he would have been shameless enough to steal an indigenous artifact if he had actually found one, but it seems that he didn't actually have any tablets. And the archeological record seems to indicate that most pre-columbian gold metallurgy was done in Central/South America, not in New York where Smith found the tablets. The Nephite tribe that Smith claimed the tablets were from isn't even a real indigenous people group. It's a fictional group of Israelites that he claims fled to the United States in ancient times.

but the modern church definitely has tablets in a museum that I've seen indigenous people claim as their people's tablets.

I'm trying to look into this and I'm finding a lot of controversies between the Mormon church and indigenous peoples, but none of them have to do with the golden plates. Most of them have to do with the church physically and sexually abusing indigenous members. I'm not finding any controversies about the Mormon church stealing an artifact from a tribe. Because there was no artifact to steal in the first place.

I think JS is one of the funniest grifters to ever grift because of how blatantly ridiculous the grift is. The truth of the Mormon church barely even matters because their lies are just so blatantly stupid.

I do think there's an important distinction between him actually stealing an indigenous artifact and no such artifact existing in the first place, but yes, he was a grifter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, agree that nephites are bullshit. Nothing Smith says should be taken seriously. Just wanna make it very clear that I'm not trying to defend the truth of Mormon historical accounts because they're clearly bullshit. But mormons over here do claim they found the plates. Remember, I don't live in Utah, I live by THAT tree. I hope you know what I'm talking about when I say that. I can PM you the place, but I can firmly say that I live in a place that facilitates a more disingenuous Mormon. This is a really hard thing to research into because I think I may be talking about things that I heard through word of mouth over the years and a couple articles I remember. I wouldn't be surprised if the church has just done a particularly good job of making people over here ignore the plates. Like I said, regardless of what is true, the plates they show are for people already in the church, not outsiders. They show them so that people get more wrapped up in it. But like I said, nothing has hieroglyphics on it.

I'd be more concerned about keeping things fully accurate, but we're talking about religion where what people believe is literally the whole thing. Joseph Smith loved archaeological finds, if the plates don't exist, he's still a grave digger who stole artifacts from other civilizations. With his history, I find distinctions on him to be unimportant

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The gold tablets are from an indigenous kingdom that had long since disappeared

i've never heard this before, i thought no such objects ever existed, no forgery no misinterpreted artifact

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The tablets are real, although I wouldn't put it past the later church leadership to steal indigenous artifacts to cover for the lie though. But we know that Smith loved looting indigenous graves during the trail of tears so it does make sense for him to find them. They show pictures of the tablets at their museums. I think they want to avoid the discussion of what the plates actually are, so they keep it low key. It's obviously not hieroglyphics, seeing the tablets only makes it less believable if you're already in on the grift. If you see them as an outsider, it's obvious bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the tablets are real

Where can I read more about this? I also thought they were forgeries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let me look for it. The source I remember for certain is that they have "tablets" in the museums they own near me. However, I know I saw an article about it being an indigenous artifact at one point. Time to scroll through my reddit history

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Joseph Smith claimed they were indigenous artifacts because in mormon "lore" indigenous North Americans are supposed to be the descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. But as far I know he never actually showed the tablets to anyone, and when some experts showed up to actually have a look at this artifact that he claimed to have found, he just told them that they were gone because they were taken back to heaven.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With what other people have said in this thread, I assume the tablets around here are something that the Mormons stole to keep the ruse up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're probably just "replicas" going off of Joseph Smith's description. As far as I know, no one ever found indigenous tablets of this kind, so it was probably something he made up entirely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I responded to a commenter like you in PMs, except they just made it super duper clear that they were exmormons. The people in my area definitely believe that the tablets are real, however I also live in one of the only areas in the US that has a distinct flavor of Mormonism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The tablets are not real. You are thinking of the book of Abraham, which was "translated" from an Egyptian funeral scroll. A lot of the rest of your info is wrong, too. (I'm an exmormon of more than 15 years, served a mission, went to byu)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I live in one of the Mormon centers outside of Utah. I can't go into detail without doxxing myself, but if you're Mormon, all I can say is that fucking tree. In the museums around here that the Mormons own, they show tablets but they don't have Hieroglyphics on it. Whether or not JS used those tablets is up for debate, but modern sects of Mormonism claim indigenous artifacts as the tablets.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

The church does not claim to have the tablets that contained the book of Mormon. They were taken from Smith by Moroni once the translation was done.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

jack mormon gang

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

The fucking letter G is an among us that is pronounced "gay".

That letter is like a Rorschach Test. I'm clearly seeing a butt with a Hitler haircut.