this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
63 points (98.5% liked)
chapotraphouse
13505 readers
29 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, every criticism I've seen in this thread applied exclusively to alpine skiing, and almost exclusively to alpine resorts.
Cross-country is basically just Other Snowshoeing. Brand new gear costs maybe a couple hundred bucks, used gear is perfectly functional and ubiquitous (at least here in Canada) and the only infrastructure or anything that needs to exist is just snow having fallen.
I think i only spent 80 bucks on my equipment, and it's been working well for the past decade for cross country lmao.
Yeah this thread is wild. It's a geography/climate tied sport. People are bitching about equipment being so expensive in California? The place famous for not getting much snow?
As this thread has tried to correct against only criticising the concept of traveling for vacations and the environmental factors of ski resorts (which both do suck yes) the criticism of non-alpine skiing has gotten even dumber than when it was just being ignored.
I guess I wish people could learn that not everything is always about them.
Tbf cross country equipment can be very expensive in a country that is all about cross country skiing.