this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
744 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38968 readers
1639 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Helping Ukraine is “a relatively modest investment with significant geopolitical returns,” the CIA director wrote.

Western allies must continue providing assistance to Ukraine in its war with Russia this year, or risk a mistake “of historic proportions,” CIA Director William Burns wrote in a column published Tuesday.

Burns laid out his case in a Foreign Affairs column, noting that less than 5 percent of the U.S. defense budget — “a relatively modest investment with significant geopolitical returns” — is all that Washington sends to Kyiv.

If an opportunity for serious negotiations to end the war emerges, he wrote, providing arms to Ukraine will put it in a stronger bargaining position. Ukraine’s military would also be able to continue fending off Russian troops while rebuilding its infrastructure, while Moscow spends massive amounts of money to keep the war going, Burns added.

“For the United States to walk away from the conflict at this crucial moment and cut off support to Ukraine would be an own goal of historic proportions,” Burns wrote, referencing a soccer term for scoring a goal for the rival team by putting the ball into a player’s own net.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You realize that weapons cost money right?

Israel cannot finance their iron dome system or F35's if they aren't free.

That would mean that israel would need to pull money from other sectors to finance their genocide.

Israel is usurping a tremendous portion of the American GDP.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Again, Netanyahu is not going to back down from this war, because if he does he goes to jail. This is his only ticket to staying out. If he needs to pull money from other sectors, he will (also, you're overstating the impact on the Israeli economy).

As compared to Ukraine, where the US's decision is of critical importance right now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Again, Netanyahu is not going to back down from this war, because if he does he goes to jail.

Exactly why all aid to them must be stopped. There is absolutely no other way to stop israel's genocide. When the pockets start hurting they will start acting differently. These people don't care about Palestinians but they care about money.

Also, you’re overstating the impact on the Israeli economy

Worldwide boycots are already hitting israel hard. Their genocide has been going on for such a long time that it is starting to hurt them, along with the Houthis blocking their shipping.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which part of `this will not stop the genocide' did you not understand?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The part where giving weapons to someone committing genocide is somehow a good idea.

If israel didn't need the weapons why is Biden bypassing congress for them?