this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
117 points (81.3% liked)

science

14697 readers
89 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
117
It’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for life (www.nature.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Review of 2023 book: How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology Philip Ball. ISBN9781529095999

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So, shall we call it "inactive regions" then?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

'Noncoding region' seems to be the preferred term.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

No, because they are anything other than inactive