Melbourne

1861 readers

106 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Four Corners story tonight (self.melbourne)

submitted 1 year ago by Thornburywitch to c/melbourne

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Four Corners on the ABC is doing a programme tonight on gender distress in children. Very difficult topic for a lot of people, but there's people here that might be interested. Link to article 4 corners. Airs at 8.30 pm on FTA also on iview shortly after. Four corners usually does a pretty good job of airing all sides of a debate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shilkanni 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn't think it was too bad. They did give a fair bit of air-time to anti-trans viewpoints but I found their arguments vague and unconvincing. The very specific case stories were very humanising.

They engaged with the anti-trans movement and allowed completely baseless claims to be aired as fact.

Which baseless claims were aired as fact?

The "22% desistance" rate in the Westmead study was immediately called out as misleading and dangerous.

I didnt see anything from Jillian Spencer or Dianna Kenny that presented as "facts" they just seemed to say they were "concerned" and that they feel "gender affirming care" is harmful but they didnt have any data. Actually everyone seems to say the other sides dont have enough evidence to back up their viewpoint.

It was pretty clear to me who was open to new evidence, and who cares more about young people. It wasn't the people speaking at rallies getting cheered on by people waving signs with hateful slogans.

[–] Ilandar 4 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the Spencer speech was intertwined with shots of Pauline Hanson, which would have instantly discredited her for a lot of viewers.