this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
89 points (96.8% liked)
Fediverse
28219 readers
643 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's partly an issue of keys. Every fediverse actor has a private key and a public key. When my instance sends this to [email protected], it's signed by my private key, and lemmy.world uses my public key to verify it. When [email protected] sends this comment out, it uses it's own private key to sign it. It can't just re-transmit my comment, because it doesn't have my private key. All it can do is Announce that I've made the comment (and sign the Announce).
Mastodon treats Announces as Boosts, so every post/comment is interpreted as a thing that [email protected] has boosted, so you get all these un-connected posts appearing. I think it's mostly up to Mastodon to remedy.
It works better if a Mastodon actor posts into a Lemmy community, then you get the mix like you imagine. e.g.: https://mastodon.world/@Flash/112095241193510662 (this particular post was crowbarred into Lemmy via [email protected], but it would be the same if the author had done it.)
Thank you for explaining it! This is a good answer! But do you think there's something that could solve this, or is impossible/unreallistic as the servers act with each other?
I don't think it's technically impossible - all the information that another site needs to properly interpret some activity is in the JSON that's sent. I get the sense that it might be unrealistic to expect Mastodon to make the necessary changes though. It seems more of a political issue than a technical one.
Do you think is unrealistic? Why do you think Mastodon has political issues to make the necessary changes?
Lemmy doesn't seem to get much recognition in the wider Fediverse - it tends to get bundled as part of 'other apps'. Mastodon is much bigger, so better integration with Lemmy probably gets deprioritised below their own issues and feature requests (e.g. I was reading today that Markdown support is often requested, but the base version still doesn't have it)
I can't directly answer your question. I know very little about Mastodon, as I just recently made an account. However, from what I've seen with a variety of open-source projects, as well as the fediverse itself, it seems that group politics may often hamper the very projects "they" are trying to improve. I hope that people try to remain in the spirit of their projects, whatever they may be.