617
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
617 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
59151 readers
3713 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Imagine if it was Apartheid South Africa, or Nazi Germany doing this. Do you see the problem now?
I don't think you understood their point: this shit is done by police everywhere, and nobody's asking for consent there either. A lot of this tech gets developed by Israel and then bought by police forces across the world. Palestinians are guinea pigs for all the latest policing and surveillance tech.
I understood it, and what I'm trying to say is: Unlike in most places, this technology isn't going to be used even ostensibly to maintain law and order; it's gonna be used for genocide. Again, think of the FBI and the Wehrmacht using the same technology. Both are bad, but one is clearly a lot worse. That's why this is cause for concern.
If they want genocide, what do they need the face recognition for?
Genocide doesn't mean wiping them all out, but that aside it's so they can enforce their reign of terror in the meantime. And because they later sell these technologies as "battle-tested".
Ehhm actually Genocide exactly means wiping them all out.
Then the Holocaust, Armenian genocide, Holodomor and Cambodian genocide weren't genocides. Good to know. Neither was the American and Canadian genocide of Native Americans.
You should read the UN's definition of genocide first.
That’s like asking why the US military would lean heavily on its intelligence apparatus while operating in some developing country with 0.01% of the military power.
Knowledge is power, and it gives you options. Maybe the surveillance helps them find high priority targets faster. Maybe it saves an Israeli life or two. Maybe all they care about is killing Palestinians, and their surveillance lets them see population movements in real time.
To commit the genocide efficienctly
Or Great Britain?