this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
492 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38977 readers
1707 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Taliban’s announcement that it is resuming publicly stoning women to death has been enabled by the international community’s silence, human rights groups have said.

Safia Arefi, a lawyer and head of the Afghan human rights organisation Women’s Window of Hope, said the announcement had condemned Afghan women to return to the darkest days of Taliban rule in the 1990s.

“With this announcement by the Taliban leader, a new chapter of private punishments has begun and Afghan women are experiencing the depths of loneliness,” Arefi said.

“Now, no one is standing beside them to save them from Taliban punishments. The international community has chosen to remain silent in the face of these violations of women’s rights.”

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 114 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Religion is a hell of a drug.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 7 months ago

In the ordinary moral universe, the good will do the best they can, the worst will do the worst they can, but if you want to make good people do wicked things, you’ll need religion

  • Christopher Hitchens
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Except drugs aren't always bad.
In reality religion is poison.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also, if we want to talk numbers, I'd guess religion has killed more people than drugs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Orders of magnitude more.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The difference between drug and poison is dosage.

Taliban is obviously OD.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This though! You can be religious without being a delusional monster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You can’t really be religious, especially a follower of Abrahamic faiths without

A: accepting what the texts actually say, which involves implicit acceptance of abhorrent views

Or

B: cherry picking and denying the abhorrent parts, which means you aren’t actually following the religion at all

If you go with B, you’re not really religious, you’re spiritual and searching for purpose and grabbing the easiest answer available.

Religion is poison

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Well put. 👍

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Religion is not always bad, just like people are not always bad generally. I'd agree that fanatism is always bad though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Second this, no matter what you believe, the problem is that here you are forcing it on others by making it a literal state law, and I can guarantee that the taliban will use this to their advantage, not for ‘justice’