Technology

37699 readers

412 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

"No, seriously. All those things Google couldn't find anymore? Top of the search pile. Queries that generated pages of spam in Google results? Fucking pristine on Kagi – the right answers, over and ov (pluralistic.net)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

129 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

SearXNG is probably at the very core of Kagi; with a bunch of extra code and UI on top of it. Bangs work as well as lenses, including external bangs. If you can dream of an engine; you can use it with SearXNG; creating an engine with it is documented well.

I promise any single thing Kagi can do that SearXNG can't or won't; won't matter. SearXNG is superior to Kagi in every way by cost, and by being free, open source, and functionally all you need.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

So it doesn't actually matter if Kagi can do something SearXNG can't.
It's cheaper. No argument with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I always thought Kagi used that money to build their complete own index.

Now I hear that their index is only tiny and it's mostly just delegated searches? Why does it cost so much then?