this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
543 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
4565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Safe Streets Rebel's protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Almost like public transit is better than self driving taxis

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can we instead have self driving buses?

I'm envisioning a system where you tell it your location and where you want to go, then it automatically sets up a route for the bus that coincides with where most people want to go and tells you to get off when it's near your destination. This can work in conjunction with self driving taxis if no one else is going to your destination.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe minibus but in no way it will works with full sized bus.
The ideal bus to commute is a bus line with frequent bus, you don't have to check the time, just show up and in a few minutes there is a bus.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not gonna get self-driving buses without self-driving cars first, so this protest is directly fucking you out of what you want

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Caving to corporations and spying on citizens isn't how you get self driving buses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=z0ddExZbKD8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Public transit is better, but self-driving taxis are absolutely coming to every city in this country, which is great if you live in a city like mine that has little to no public transport infrastructure.

Also, automated taxis can service more rural areas, which is the key driver of lack of public transport in many "commuter cities."

Luddites gonna Luddite, but this tech is coming, and it's coming to logistics and taxis first.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, but SanFran ain't one of those. Taxis have the same problem cars do, which is size.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can tell you aren't from SF. Because no one from here calls it SanFran. But I digress. Uber is huge here because it is where it started. And buses come with other baggage. Many homeless people and plenty of pervs doing shady things deter people from using the system regularly. Having seen the system it is substantial, but getting out of the city is the issue. San Francisco proper is very small 7x7 miles (49 square miles, Easter egg from being 1849 and the 49ers). But going anywhere outside of the city is where things take forever and why most affluent people do not use those systems. 2 hours back and forth is not economic on time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, I'm not. Homeless on our public transit isn't an issue because our police actually responds to driver calls.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am well aware of both the benefits of public transport and this image specifically. This is irrelevant to our discussion

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not if I'm arguing that self driving taxis are stupid

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Self driving taxis aren't stupid. They better fit the existing infrastructure within America.

Taxis as a whole generally serve a different market function than public transportation in the US.

Im all for gutting zoning, and building dense, walkable cities, full of public transportation free at POS - but that's not the world we live in.

Self-driving taxis are such a massive net boon for people that it's not even a comparison to the alternative

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

On that I will agree, but I still stand that self driving taxis are stupid. BUT, they are necessary due to how NA cities are built, and getting rid of them would require many other changes as well

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not for the profits of these private companies.