this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
200 points (97.2% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

525 readers
107 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently, it's rare for lawyers to draw objections during their opening statements, but it happened twice for Trump's team today and the judge sustained both objections.

MSNBC Commentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-XetPGnx0M

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A single juror can hold up the delivery of a verdict, but they can't "nullify" it after it's been delivered.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

To clarify: In jury nullification the verdict doesn't get nullified. The law does. The scenario of jury nullification involves a guilty defendant going free due to the juror's principles--and it's immaterial whether those principles are founded in reason, truth, morality, sound jurisprudence, or sanity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately so. Like I would do my best to jury nullify any marijuana case. But the history in jury nullification is allowing racists to do lynchings. Repugnant.