Technology

59186 readers

4308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

458

Biden signs bill criticized as “major expansion of warrantless surveillance” (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

In a very confusing way you are saying surveillance is justified because in other parts of the world people are not protected by their country's justice system. So it's better to be overly surveiled than nothing at all.

Which I fundamentally disagree with and am equally upset about either circumstance.

Especially when the people doing the surveillance operate outside the confinement of the justice system. See BLM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah. No, I'm against any surveillance. At the same time I'm for all the transparency of government one can have.

It's basically about how hierarchical the society is.

A lot of clueless people want power structures to have their secrets, while citizens can be surveilled, cause it's to some good end (/s).

The more hierarchical it is, the more corruption and abuse of power there are, and make no mistake - people making it more hierarchical aim for that only and not for some noble goal.

I'm just saying that this same tendency which inconveniences people in the West with surveillance and legally dubious harassment, simply kills people elsewhere in droves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Again, the people who are doing the surveillance have the means to kill people extrajudiciously. This just allows them to bring the surveillance they are already doing into the court room.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

WDYM "again"? What are you arguing against?