Yeah I'm also glad Nell was Grusch's replacement. The fact that these guys are/were really high up, clean slate, no bullshitters really hits hard. And how they say everything so "matter of fact".

This really feels like the slow/soft disclosure. The Schumer amendment, and importantly the portion that was gutted, is all a big part of it. How can people deny it now? Yes, we all want to see the "cool stuff" and really hard evidence, I get it. But I feel like the default position should be essentially what Nell said, that the gov't has pretty much admitted to it. If debunkers want to say it's all a conspiracy theory or scam, I feel like they need to provide some convincing evidence. I don't think im asking to prove a negative given everything we have at this point.

I'm still bitter about that amendment. Would love to be a "fly on the wall" in regards to the House Republicans that were responsible for the block. Were they payed out without being informed of why, or are they clued in? I could see them just taking money and being told just to block it, and what specifics to remove. We may never know. If we get full disclosure, it might not matter and be forgotten. I'd still like some accountability though, lol.