this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2878 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian bots with a Kremlin disinformation network published 120,000 fake anti-Ukraine quotes falsely attributed to celebrities, including Jennifer Aniston and Scarlett Johansson, in one day, the independent Russian media outlet Agentsvo reported June 15.

Quotes appeared over celebrity photos, displaying messages calling to end aid to Ukraine and describing European collapse.

The images were published between June 14-15 by the Kremlin disinformation network Dvoynyk, a representative of the Bot Blocker project told Agentsvo. The fake quotes have since garnered over 500,000 views.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You mean Amal Clooney, the international Human Rights Lawyer? The adjunct professor of law at Columbia University? Advisor to the International Criminal Court? That Amal Clooney?

The fact that she's married to a celebrity is the least interesting thing about her in the context of Israel and the ICC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And I will once again say that the actor should be referred to as "Amal Clooney's husband" rather than the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

My favourite description under a picture of the two in a (German) newspaper read (paraphrased): Civil right's attorney Amal Clooney and her husband, an actor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

*Coffee Salesman

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Through the use of satellite imagery, SSP provides an early warning system to deter mass atrocities in a given situation by focusing world attention and generating rapid responses to human rights and human security concerns taking place in that situation.

...

SSP was the first to provide evidence consistent with the razing of the villages of Maker Abior, Todach, and Tajalei in the Abyei region of Sudan, and the project has discovered eight alleged mass graves in South Kordofan, Sudan.

Did you think we wouldn't look at your link or do you think trying to get attention and a rapid response to atrocities is a bad thing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

? No? You took that as unnecessarily hostile.

I think it's cool and George Clooney should be better known for his humanitarian work over his acting career. Wish more rich people were more proactive like this.

It also should be considering when talking about his wife's work. They are related topics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Calling it a spy satellite implies it's doing something nefarious. It's not. Calling it something like a monitoring satellite would be more accurate because it's doing the same thing for human rights that a weather monitoring satellite is doing for warning people about hurricanes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance_satellite

Spy satellite is the popular nomenclature though Recon or Intel satellite are more accurate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I'll get down voted but sure.

Nobody knew who she was before.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Plenty of people knew who she was before. You didn't, because you don't pay attention to international human rights struggles.