That looks horrible.
Cybersecurity
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Notable mention to [email protected]
indeed, but your SSH ports should not be hanging out in the wind for any old IP to hit.
openssh is typically quite robust, this is a rare exception
On June 6, 2024, this signal handler race condition was fixed by commit 81c1099 ("Add a facility to sshd(8) to penalise particular problematic client behaviours"), which moved the async-signal-unsafe code from sshd's SIGALRM handler to sshd's listener process, where it can be handled synchronously:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/81c1099d22b81ebfd20a334ce986c4f753b0db29
Because this fix is part of a large commit (81c1099), on top of an even larger defense-in-depth commit (03e3de4, "Start the process of splitting sshd into separate binaries"), it might prove difficult to backport.
Oh shit, now squash on merge folks can claim "defense-in-depth".
Always makes me think of this comic by geek and poke
It says 4.4 to 8.4 versions are not vulnerable. A lot of old distro releases are on these versions, Debian 10, 11, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS is not affected https://pkgs.org/download/openssh-server