this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
99 points (93.0% liked)

Apple

17433 readers
315 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Woah, they designed the cloth with forward compatibility? Thanks Tim Apple!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

From my frame of reference they designed the phones to be backwards compatible with preexisting accessories.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

It's a shame it's not compatible with my iPhone 4

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Oh thank God, just the news I ~~wanted~~ needed to hear today.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Surprised they didn’t announce @ the keynote!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why is this posted, much less upvoted?

Who gives a fuck about a polishing cloth? Sounds like a joke.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a joke.

You might be on to something

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

Oh, I think we’re all laughing at the inanity of it

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I appreciate the randomness and the fact that the polishing cloth is only backwards compatible to the iPhone 5 and iPad 4th gen. No mention of any other devices prior to like 2012 which is kinda funny honestly. It is a polishing cloth. I could use it to dust the display of my Philco Predicta and it would do just fine 😂 (not that I have one…just providing a ridiculous example).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think this is just a result of the apple store's accessory recommendation system. Probably so few people use anything older than iPhone 5, it doesn't make sense to include anything before that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they put product compatibility for everything on the site. But we also enjoy shit posting about this over priced microfiber cloth every year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh I know. It is just a ridiculous oversight. Compatibility could have easily been hidden for the page and it would have made more sense lol. This is just poor website implementation. Harmless but also makes them look dumb and pretentious 🤣

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's intentional design, search engine optimisation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Invisible text can accomplish the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are the models prior to the iphone 5 even viable? 3G network is long gone at this point, I don't think they had 4G capability until the 5. They'd be entirely wifi-bound

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What are you saying? That the polishing cloth needs at least 4G?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

At this point? 6G at minimum, with no backwards compatibility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting that it doesn’t list the Apple Vision Pro, even though the AVP came with one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s a completely different cloth. You can’t use the iPhone polishing cloth on the AVP and vice versa.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Wiping with the wrong wipe may wipe your data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The mods need to do something about all the heresy being promulgated!

Execution perhaps?